Name of reviewer: * Title: "El acceso a la justicia y a los servicios de apoyo de las víctimas de violencia de género en Europa: buenas prácticas y valoración de su impacto"COORDINATORS: Ricardo JUAN SÁNCHEZ, Vicenta CERVELLÓ DONDERIS and José GARCÍA AÑÓN 1) Quality of the workshop proposal (see brief description of the workshop, workshop programme, CVs of organisers and their prior publications [including with the IISL]) * Please assess in this section: ● Does the workshop meaningfully contribute to socio-legal studies / sociology of law? ● Do track-record and scholarly potential of the organisers let expect a good workshop? ● What are the prospects of successful publication of workshop in IISL outlets? 12345 Your score: (max. 5 points) * Your score: (max. 5 points) - 1 Your score: (max. 5 points) - 2 Your score: (max. 5 points) - 3 Your score: (max. 5 points) - 4 Your score: (max. 5 points) - 5 Your comments: * (In key words or bullet points) 2) Originality of the proposed workshop (see the respective section in the workshop proposal (see the respective document in the application file) * Please assess in this section: ● What makes this workshop original and distinctive vs. "more of the same"? ● Does it aim to open new lines of research (and are these still relevant to the IISL)? ● Does it create novel connections between different fields, approaches, communities? 12345 Your score: (max. 5 points) * Your score: (max. 5 points) - 1 Your score: (max. 5 points) - 2 Your score: (max. 5 points) - 3 Your score: (max. 5 points) - 4 Your score: (max. 5 points) - 5 Your comments: * (In key words or bullet points) 3) Spread of participation (see list of participants [please focus on confirmed participants marked with *], language of the workshop and the proposal, and related explanations) * Please assess in this section: ● To what extent do participants represent different national/regional/cultural contexts? ● Are participants from different career stages actively involved in the workshop? ● Is the choice of the language of the workshop appropriate (English, Spanish, bilingual)? 12345 Your score: (max. 5 points) * Your score: (max. 5 points) - 1 Your score: (max. 5 points) - 2 Your score: (max. 5 points) - 3 Your score: (max. 5 points) - 4 Your score: (max. 5 points) - 5 Your comments: * (In key words or bullet points) 4) Relevance to the Basque Country (see the respective section in the workshop proposal) * Please assess in this section: ● To what extent does the proposal indicate connections to the Basque Country? ● If it is not specifically dealing with Basque topics: Is it still relevant for local people? ● If it is explicitly taking up Basque topics: Is this done in a scholarly convincing manner? 12345 Your score: (max. 5 points) * Your score: (max. 5 points) - 1 Your score: (max. 5 points) - 2 Your score: (max. 5 points) - 3 Your score: (max. 5 points) - 4 Your score: (max. 5 points) - 5 Your comments: * (In key words or bullet points) Title: "Legal Survivals and Global Legal Pluralism"COORDINATORS: Rafał MAŃKO and Ewa GÓRSKA 1) Quality of the workshop proposal (see brief description of the workshop, workshop programme, CVs of organisers and their prior publications [including with the IISL]) * Please assess in this section: ● Does the workshop meaningfully contribute to socio-legal studies / sociology of law? ● Do track-record and scholarly potential of the organisers let expect a good workshop? ● What are the prospects of successful publication of workshop in IISL outlets? 12345 Your score: (max. 5 points) * Your score: (max. 5 points) - 1 Your score: (max. 5 points) - 2 Your score: (max. 5 points) - 3 Your score: (max. 5 points) - 4 Your score: (max. 5 points) - 5 Your comments: * (In key words or bullet points) 2) Originality of the proposed workshop (see the respective section in the workshop proposal (see the respective document in the application file) * Please assess in this section: ● What makes this workshop original and distinctive vs. "more of the same"? ● Does it aim to open new lines of research (and are these still relevant to the IISL)? ● Does it create novel connections between different fields, approaches, communities? 12345 Your score: (max. 5 points) * Your score: (max. 5 points) - 1 Your score: (max. 5 points) - 2 Your score: (max. 5 points) - 3 Your score: (max. 5 points) - 4 Your score: (max. 5 points) - 5 Your comments: * (In key words or bullet points) 3) Spread of participation (see list of participants [please focus on confirmed participants marked with *], language of the workshop and the proposal, and related explanations) * Please assess in this section: ● To what extent do participants represent different national/regional/cultural contexts? ● Are participants from different career stages actively involved in the workshop? ● Is the choice of the language of the workshop appropriate (English, Spanish, bilingual)? 12345 Your score: (max. 5 points) * Your score: (max. 5 points) - 1 Your score: (max. 5 points) - 2 Your score: (max. 5 points) - 3 Your score: (max. 5 points) - 4 Your score: (max. 5 points) - 5 Your comments: * (In key words or bullet points) 4) Relevance to the Basque Country (see the respective section in the workshop proposal) * Please assess in this section: ● To what extent does the proposal indicate connections to the Basque Country? ● If it is not specifically dealing with Basque topics: Is it still relevant for local people? ● If it is explicitly taking up Basque topics: Is this done in a scholarly convincing manner? 12345 Your score: (max. 5 points) * Your score: (max. 5 points) - 1 Your score: (max. 5 points) - 2 Your score: (max. 5 points) - 3 Your score: (max. 5 points) - 4 Your score: (max. 5 points) - 5 Your comments: * (In key words or bullet points) Title: "Virtual Criminal Justice"COORDINATORS: Carolyn MCKAY, Dorris DE VOCHT, Lisa FLOWER, Christina PERISTERIDOU and Karolina KREMENS 1) Quality of the workshop proposal (see brief description of the workshop, workshop programme, CVs of organisers and their prior publications [including with the IISL]) * Please assess in this section: ● Does the workshop meaningfully contribute to socio-legal studies / sociology of law? ● Do track-record and scholarly potential of the organisers let expect a good workshop? ● What are the prospects of successful publication of workshop in IISL outlets? 12345 Your score: (max. 5 points) * Your score: (max. 5 points) - 1 Your score: (max. 5 points) - 2 Your score: (max. 5 points) - 3 Your score: (max. 5 points) - 4 Your score: (max. 5 points) - 5 Your comments: * (In key words or bullet points) 2) Originality of the proposed workshop (see the respective section in the workshop proposal (see the respective document in the application file) * Please assess in this section: ● What makes this workshop original and distinctive vs. "more of the same"? ● Does it aim to open new lines of research (and are these still relevant to the IISL)? ● Does it create novel connections between different fields, approaches, communities? 12345 Your score: (max. 5 points) * Your score: (max. 5 points) - 1 Your score: (max. 5 points) - 2 Your score: (max. 5 points) - 3 Your score: (max. 5 points) - 4 Your score: (max. 5 points) - 5 Your comments: * (In key words or bullet points) 3) Spread of participation (see list of participants [please focus on confirmed participants marked with *], language of the workshop and the proposal, and related explanations) * Please assess in this section: ● To what extent do participants represent different national/regional/cultural contexts? ● Are participants from different career stages actively involved in the workshop? ● Is the choice of the language of the workshop appropriate (English, Spanish, bilingual)? 12345 Your score: (max. 5 points) * Your score: (max. 5 points) - 1 Your score: (max. 5 points) - 2 Your score: (max. 5 points) - 3 Your score: (max. 5 points) - 4 Your score: (max. 5 points) - 5 Your comments: * (In key words or bullet points) 4) Relevance to the Basque Country (see the respective section in the workshop proposal) * Please assess in this section: ● To what extent does the proposal indicate connections to the Basque Country? ● If it is not specifically dealing with Basque topics: Is it still relevant for local people? ● If it is explicitly taking up Basque topics: Is this done in a scholarly convincing manner? 12345 Your score: (max. 5 points) * Your score: (max. 5 points) - 1 Your score: (max. 5 points) - 2 Your score: (max. 5 points) - 3 Your score: (max. 5 points) - 4 Your score: (max. 5 points) - 5 Your comments: * (In key words or bullet points) Title: "Sexual and Reproductive Health and Rights (SRHR) under the Spectrum of Sex, Gender and Sexuality"COORDINATORS: Nikoletta PIKRAMENOU, Marta BUCHOLC and Barbara Giovanna BELLO 1) Quality of the workshop proposal (see brief description of the workshop, workshop programme, CVs of organisers and their prior publications [including with the IISL]) * Please assess in this section: ● Does the workshop meaningfully contribute to socio-legal studies / sociology of law? ● Do track-record and scholarly potential of the organisers let expect a good workshop? ● What are the prospects of successful publication of workshop in IISL outlets? 12345 Your score: (max. 5 points) * Your score: (max. 5 points) - 1 Your score: (max. 5 points) - 2 Your score: (max. 5 points) - 3 Your score: (max. 5 points) - 4 Your score: (max. 5 points) - 5 Your comments: * (In key words or bullet points) 2) Originality of the proposed workshop (see the respective section in the workshop proposal (see the respective document in the application file) * Please assess in this section: ● What makes this workshop original and distinctive vs. "more of the same"? ● Does it aim to open new lines of research (and are these still relevant to the IISL)? ● Does it create novel connections between different fields, approaches, communities? 12345 Your score: (max. 5 points) * Your score: (max. 5 points) - 1 Your score: (max. 5 points) - 2 Your score: (max. 5 points) - 3 Your score: (max. 5 points) - 4 Your score: (max. 5 points) - 5 Your comments: * (In key words or bullet points) 3) Spread of participation (see list of participants [please focus on confirmed participants marked with *], language of the workshop and the proposal, and related explanations) * Please assess in this section: ● To what extent do participants represent different national/regional/cultural contexts? ● Are participants from different career stages actively involved in the workshop? ● Is the choice of the language of the workshop appropriate (English, Spanish, bilingual)? 12345 Your score: (max. 5 points) * Your score: (max. 5 points) - 1 Your score: (max. 5 points) - 2 Your score: (max. 5 points) - 3 Your score: (max. 5 points) - 4 Your score: (max. 5 points) - 5 Your comments: * (In key words or bullet points) 4) Relevance to the Basque Country (see the respective section in the workshop proposal) * Please assess in this section: ● To what extent does the proposal indicate connections to the Basque Country? ● If it is not specifically dealing with Basque topics: Is it still relevant for local people? ● If it is explicitly taking up Basque topics: Is this done in a scholarly convincing manner? 12345 Your score: (max. 5 points) * Your score: (max. 5 points) - 1 Your score: (max. 5 points) - 2 Your score: (max. 5 points) - 3 Your score: (max. 5 points) - 4 Your score: (max. 5 points) - 5 Your comments: * (In key words or bullet points) Overall scoring: * Considering my above scores and comments for the applications I was assigned to review, I arrive at the following ranking of the selected applications: A (best)B (medium)C (lowest) El acceso a la justicia y a los servicios de apoyo de las víctimas de violencia de género en Europa * El acceso a la justicia y a los servicios de apoyo de las víctimas de violencia de género en Europa - A (best) El acceso a la justicia y a los servicios de apoyo de las víctimas de violencia de género en Europa - B (medium) El acceso a la justicia y a los servicios de apoyo de las víctimas de violencia de género en Europa - C (lowest) Legal Survivals and Global Legal Pluralism * Legal Survivals and Global Legal Pluralism - A (best) Legal Survivals and Global Legal Pluralism - B (medium) Legal Survivals and Global Legal Pluralism - C (lowest) Virtual Criminal Justice * Virtual Criminal Justice - A (best) Virtual Criminal Justice - B (medium) Virtual Criminal Justice - C (lowest) Sexual and Reproductive Health and Rights (SRHR) under the Spectrum of Sex, Gender and Sexuality * Sexual and Reproductive Health and Rights (SRHR) under the Spectrum of Sex, Gender and Sexuality - A (best) Sexual and Reproductive Health and Rights (SRHR) under the Spectrum of Sex, Gender and Sexuality - B (medium) Sexual and Reproductive Health and Rights (SRHR) under the Spectrum of Sex, Gender and Sexuality - C (lowest) I authorize the IISL to process my assessment information: * I authorize the Institute to use the information on the evaluation of applications for the evaluation of proposals received and only for that purpose. YES NO Sending date: Month MonthFeb Day Day22 Year Year2025 CAPTCHAThis question is for testing whether or not you are a human visitor and to prevent automated spam submissions. Math question * 11 + 5 = More information? Submit For more information: Workshop Coordination Team Avenida de la Universidad, 8 Apartado 28 20560 Oñati (Gipuzkoa) - Spain T: +34 943 78... Ver teléfono E: workshop@iisj.es @IISJOnati
.jpg)
